SPRX vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPRX (Spear Alpha ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPRX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Spear, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPRX returned 109.60% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SPRX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

SPRX vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spear Alpha ETF (SPRX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPRX achieves a 50.26% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.06% return.

SPRX

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 33.49%
• YTD: 50.26%
• 6M: 44.40%
• 1Y: 109.60%
• 3Y*: 48.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPRX vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPRX Spear Alpha ETF	50.26%	41.91%	20.58%	32.35%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SPRX and BAMU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between SPRX and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPRX vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPRX	BAMU
Technology	72.7%	-
Industrials	15.5%	-
Financial Services	8.0%	98.8%
Communication Services	3.9%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SPRX vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPRX

SPRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
SPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPRX vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spear Alpha ETF (SPRX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPRX	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	4.98	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	8.77	-5.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.41	-1.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.55	24.89	-20.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.41	97.89	-83.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPRX vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPRX and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPRX	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	4.98	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	4.14	-3.55

Drawdowns

SPRX vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPRX drawdown since its inception was -51.21%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPRX and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPRX	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.21%	-0.36%	-50.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.21%	-0.12%	-24.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	0.00%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-0.02%	-17.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.63%	0.03%	+7.60%

Volatility

SPRX vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Spear Alpha ETF (SPRX) has a higher volatility of 14.91% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that SPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPRX	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.91%	0.07%	+14.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.46%	0.43%	+35.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.53%	0.59%	+42.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.74%	0.87%	+40.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.74%	0.87%	+40.87%

SPRX vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPRX vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

SPRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%
SPRX Spear Alpha ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPRX and BAMU in my portfolio?

SPRX and BAMU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPRX or BAMU?

SPRX has higher volatility (14.91%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPRX dropped -51.21% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, SPRX or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, SPRX leads with 109.60% vs 2.93% for BAMU. On fees, SPRX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPRX or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, SPRX has performed better with a 109.60% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPRX or BAMU?

SPRX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPRX or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for SPRX.

What is the main difference between SPRX and BAMU?

SPRX is categorized as Technology Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Spear and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPRX and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.