PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPRE vs. FREL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPRE vs. FREL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPRE achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly lower than FREL's 11.64% return.


SPRE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.38%
YTD
11.02%
6M
10.24%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*

FREL

1D
0.10%
1M
1.19%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.23%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPRE vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPRE
SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF
11.02%3.07%2.11%9.40%-29.48%44.78%-0.17%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
11.64%3.09%5.05%11.74%-26.21%40.46%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPRE and FREL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

0.92

The correlation between SPRE and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPRE vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPRE
SPRE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPRE vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPREFRELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

4.18

+0.50

SPRE vs. FREL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the FREL Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPRE and FREL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPRE vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPRE drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPRE and FREL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPREFRELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.34%

-42.61%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-8.45%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

-17.54%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.34%

-34.40%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-0.67%

-9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-9.91%

-7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.70%

+0.08%

Volatility

SPRE vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) is 4.67%, while Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that SPRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FREL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPREFRELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.15%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

10.20%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

13.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.90%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

20.72%

-2.33%

SPRE vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPRE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPRE vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison

SPRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FREL's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.27%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%
SPRE
SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF
3.75%4.10%4.13%4.16%4.17%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPRE and FREL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FREL has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to SPRE (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPRE dropped -38.34% vs FREL's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, FREL leads with 2.64% vs 1.93% for SPRE. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FREL has performed better with a 2.64% return vs 1.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SPRE.

SPRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 3.27% for FREL.

SPRE tracks S&P Global All Equity REIT Shariah Capped Index, while FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SPRE and 0.08% for FREL.

SPRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPRE and FREL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer