SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE
SPQH.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and BLCH.DE (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SPQH.DE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 9% (-3% to -12%) Buffer Protect Index, while BLCH.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPQH.DE returned 5.93%/yr vs 56.73%/yr for BLCH.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPQH.DE achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than BLCH.DE's 32.88% return.
SPQH.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCH.DE
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 32.88%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 94.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPQH.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 1.52% | -4.41% | 21.88% | 6.82% |
BLCH.DE Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 32.88% | 20.01% | 12.63% | 160.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPQH.DE
BLCH.DE
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPQH.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.84 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 3.38 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPQH.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.47 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.15 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum BLCH.DE drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPQH.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -83.29% | +65.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -54.12% | +50.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.68% | -60.08% | +42.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -24.94% | +19.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -44.08% | +39.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 29.42% | -28.03% |
Volatility
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) is 1.63%, while Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) has a volatility of 16.11%. This indicates that SPQH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPQH.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 16.11% | -14.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 46.03% | -41.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.30% | 67.91% | -60.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 74.21% | -63.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 74.21% | -63.42% |
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
SPQH.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPQH.DE nor BLCH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
SPQH.DE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLCH.DE is Technology Equities. SPQH.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 9% (-3% to -12%) Buffer Protect Index, while BLCH.DE tracks Solactive Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for SPQH.DE and BLCH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer