PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BLCH.DE
Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-13.48%20.01%12.63%318.01%-47.67%
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-11.70%13.17%12.43%235.40%-36.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCH.DE achieves a -13.48% return, which is significantly lower than CBUT.DE's -11.70% return.


BLCH.DE

1D
6.53%
1M
-10.52%
YTD
-13.48%
6M
-32.46%
1Y
69.58%
3Y*
41.75%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUT.DE

1D
4.43%
1M
-7.45%
YTD
-11.70%
6M
-29.38%
1Y
43.93%
3Y*
32.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLCH.DE and CBUT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Return for Risk

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCH.DE
BLCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BLCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUT.DE
CBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLCH.DECBUT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.81

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.37

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.89

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.34

1.87

+0.47

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCH.DE and CBUT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLCH.DECBUT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.81

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.47

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between BLCH.DE and CBUT.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLCH.DE nor CBUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -83.29%, which is greater than CBUT.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCH.DE and CBUT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCH.DECBUT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.29%

-53.95%

-29.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.12%

-43.09%

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.13%

-40.56%

-10.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.57%

-19.81%

-24.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.12%

20.45%

+5.67%

Volatility

BLCH.DE vs. CBUT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.27% compared to iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) at 14.67%. This indicates that BLCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BLCH.DECBUT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.27%

14.67%

+3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.14%

40.42%

+13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.05%

54.06%

+14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.60%

60.93%

+13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.60%

60.93%

+13.67%