SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE
SPQB.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF) and XZEW.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both S&P 500 funds - SPQB.DE tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect while XZEW.DE tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPQB.DE returned 9.37%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for XZEW.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPQB.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for XZEW.DE.
Performance
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPQB.DE achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than XZEW.DE's 10.78% return.
SPQB.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XZEW.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPQB.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF | 5.30% | -0.77% | 20.64% | 10.42% |
XZEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 10.78% | 1.09% | 18.02% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPQB.DE and XZEW.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SPQB.DE and XZEW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPQB.DE
XZEW.DE
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPQB.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 4.33 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 12.75 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPQB.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.98 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, smaller than the maximum XZEW.DE drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPQB.DE and XZEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPQB.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -23.98% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -5.00% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.15% | -23.98% | +7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -4.76% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.70% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) is 1.19%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that SPQB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPQB.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 2.12% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | 6.92% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 10.93% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 13.97% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 13.97% | -4.43% |
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPQB.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XZEW.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPQB.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPQB.DE nor XZEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPQB.DE and XZEW.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZEW.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
SPQB.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect, while XZEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPQB.DE and 0.17% for XZEW.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPQB.DE and XZEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer