PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPPX.DE) and Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist (DJAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPPX.DE having a 5.09% return and DJAD.DE slightly lower at 4.92%. Over the past 10 years, SPPX.DE has outperformed DJAD.DE with an annualized return of -1.66%, while DJAD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -3.11% annualized return.


SPPX.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.04%
YTD
5.09%
6M
5.56%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
-1.69%
5Y*
-4.26%
10Y*
-1.66%

DJAD.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.08%
YTD
4.92%
6M
5.35%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
-4.26%
10Y*
-3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPPX.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
5.09%-6.02%-0.97%-0.77%-24.28%3.04%6.12%17.93%2.67%-4.61%
DJAD.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist
4.92%-6.15%-0.86%-0.75%-24.23%3.18%6.09%17.33%-14.73%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2016

0.90

The correlation between SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPX.DE
SPPX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SPPX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DJAD.DE
DJAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DJAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPPX.DE) and Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist (DJAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPPX.DEDJAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

2.51

+0.11

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the DJAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPX.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, roughly equal to the maximum DJAD.DE drawdown of -44.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPX.DEDJAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-44.43%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-6.38%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-16.68%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.55%

-36.54%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-44.43%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.37%

-38.25%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-17.81%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.96%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPPX.DE) and Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist (DJAD.DE) have volatilities of 2.39% and 2.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPX.DEDJAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

2.37%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

6.05%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.00%

8.94%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.22%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

14.02%

+2.46%

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPX.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DJAD.DE's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPPX.DE vs. DJAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPPX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than DJAD.DE's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DJAD.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist
3.33%3.50%3.53%2.88%3.36%2.22%2.38%2.87%3.22%2.75%0.00%
SPPX.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.42%4.77%4.08%3.14%2.57%1.63%2.07%2.42%2.38%2.77%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DJAD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DJAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPPX.DE.

SPPX.DE tracks Bloomberg US 10+ Year Treasury Bond, while DJAD.DE tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPPX.DE and 0.06% for DJAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPX.DE and DJAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer