PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPPW.DE having a 10.85% return and DBXW.DE slightly higher at 10.90%.


SPPW.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.83%
YTD
10.85%
6M
11.34%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*

DBXW.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.86%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.35%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPPW.DE
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
10.85%8.03%26.09%20.25%-13.28%32.66%5.27%17.24%
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.90%7.77%25.74%20.10%-13.86%32.72%5.42%17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2019

1.00

The correlation between SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPW.DE
SPPW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPPW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXW.DE
DBXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPPW.DEDBXW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.58

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

14.33

+0.37

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPPW.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.13

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.84

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.49

+0.37

Drawdowns

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum DBXW.DE drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPW.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-53.36%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-6.59%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-21.66%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-21.66%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.32%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-9.48%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.65%

-0.02%

Volatility

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPW.DEDBXW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.60%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

7.73%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

11.09%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

15.02%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

15.54%

+0.54%

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPW.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXW.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPPW.DE vs. DBXW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPW.DE nor DBXW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPPW.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPPW.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBXW.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPPW.DE and 0.45% for DBXW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPW.DE and DBXW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer