PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXW.DE vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBXW.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXW.DE achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBXW.DE having a 12.75% annualized return and SCHD not far behind at 12.47%.


DBXW.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.86%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.35%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.75%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.89%
YTD
20.43%
6M
19.23%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.90%7.77%25.74%20.10%-13.86%32.72%5.42%31.34%-4.85%7.73%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
21.18%-8.04%19.03%1.41%2.74%39.59%5.55%30.17%-1.13%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXW.DE and SCHD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between DBXW.DE and SCHD has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXW.DE
DBXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXW.DESCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

6.24

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

14.97

-0.65

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXW.DE and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXW.DESCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.22

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.65

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.72

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.88

-0.39

Drawdowns

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXW.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXW.DE and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXW.DESCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-32.28%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-4.15%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.66%

-21.40%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-21.40%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

-32.28%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.46%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-4.43%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.73%

-0.08%

Volatility

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) is 2.60%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that DBXW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXW.DESCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.99%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

8.53%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

11.74%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

14.60%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

17.44%

-1.90%

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBXW.DE vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

DBXW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXW.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.24%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXW.DE and SCHD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBXW.DE.

DBXW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. DBXW.DE tracks MSCI World, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBXW.DE and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXW.DE and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer