PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -14.37% return, which is significantly lower than SGDJ's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP has underperformed SGDJ with an annualized return of 8.53%, while SGDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


SPPP

1D
-4.12%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-14.37%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
39.19%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
-6.33%
10Y*
8.53%

SGDJ

1D
-3.43%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.97%
6M
12.36%
1Y
80.74%
3Y*
49.76%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
-14.37%89.43%-11.89%-25.86%-2.37%-21.77%23.84%46.00%5.53%35.36%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
1.97%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP and SGDJ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.47

The correlation between SPPP and SGDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (10 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPP vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP
SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPPPSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

2.44

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

6.48

-4.25

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPPPSGDJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.68

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.43

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.29

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.36

-0.26

Drawdowns

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPPSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.09%

-59.27%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.42%

-33.22%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.42%

-33.22%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.50%

-54.90%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

-59.27%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.14%

-25.66%

-10.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.48%

-26.25%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.60%

12.50%

+5.10%

Volatility

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is 10.71%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that SPPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPPSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

13.18%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.53%

39.87%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.97%

48.34%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.89%

40.28%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

40.74%

-7.64%

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPPP vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.21%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPPP and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to SPPP (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPPP dropped -59.09% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.97% vs 8.53% for SPPP. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPPP has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.

SPPP is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGDJ is Materials. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for SPPP and 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPP and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer