SPPP vs. GLDM
SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. SPPP is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPPP returned -6.33%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPPP charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
SPPP vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPP achieves a -14.37% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.
SPPP
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 39.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SPPP vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -14.37% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 18.32% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPP and GLDM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between SPPP and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPPP vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
SPPP
GLDM
SPPP vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.70 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 4.23 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.24 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | 1.04 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.02 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
SPPP vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPP drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | -21.63% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.42% | -19.14% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.42% | -19.14% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.50% | -20.92% | -37.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.14% | -17.65% | -18.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.48% | -6.22% | -20.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.60% | 7.69% | +9.91% |
Volatility
SPPP vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that SPPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPPP | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 5.47% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.53% | 22.99% | +22.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.97% | 26.39% | +24.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.89% | 17.91% | +16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.10% | 16.85% | +16.25% |
SPPP vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPPP has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPPP vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPPP nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPPP and GLDM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPPP has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPPP dropped -59.09% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs -6.33% for SPPP. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs -6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for SPPP.
SPPP and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SPPP is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for SPPP and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPPP and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer