SPPP.TO vs. PALL
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Performance
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPPP.TO Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -6.74% | 80.99% | -4.13% | -27.75% | 4.71% | -22.45% | 21.69% | 38.30% | 18.42% |
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -6.09% | 66.08% | -10.28% | -40.12% | 0.40% | -23.95% | 23.15% | 46.37% | 32.26% |
Different Trading Currencies
SPPP.TO is traded in CAD, while PALL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PALL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPPP.TO achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than PALL's -6.09% return.
SPPP.TO
- 1D
- 4.71%
- 1M
- -16.52%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 50.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- -2.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PALL
- 1D
- 5.03%
- 1M
- -15.41%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 0.87%
- 5Y*
- -9.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPPP.TO vs. PALL — Risk / Return Rank
SPPP.TO
PALL
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPPP.TO | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.91 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.39 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 4.16 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPPP.TO | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.91 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.24 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.28 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPPP.TO and PALL is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPPP.TO nor PALL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPPP.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, smaller than the maximum PALL drawdown of -71.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.TO and PALL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPPP.TO | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.80% | -73.63% | +16.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.73% | -34.17% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.80% | -73.63% | +16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.19% | -54.34% | +24.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -26.51% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 11.31% | +1.04% |
Volatility
SPPP.TO vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) at 15.36%. This indicates that SPPP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPPP.TO | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.58% | 15.36% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.27% | 43.20% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.17% | 48.32% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 40.55% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 36.28% | -1.87% |