PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPPP.L is traded in GBp, while XPPT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XPPT.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a -20.95% return, which is significantly higher than XPPT.DE's -28.05% return.


SPPP.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
-17.86%
YTD
-20.95%
6M
-28.29%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
3.71%

XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.54%
YTD
-28.05%
6M
-28.05%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
-20.95%104.81%-8.43%-10.70%24.01%-10.35%25.79%
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-28.05%125.60%-7.56%-10.75%22.56%-8.85%13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP.L and XPPT.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.92

The correlation between SPPP.L and XPPT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP.L
SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPPP.LXPPT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

1.11

-0.02

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and XPPT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than XPPT.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and XPPT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPPP.LXPPT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-42.69%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.34%

-42.69%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.34%

-42.69%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.34%

-42.69%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.34%

-42.69%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-15.94%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.23%

19.93%

-0.70%

Volatility

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) have volatilities of 10.41% and 10.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPPP.LXPPT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.41%

10.57%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.73%

38.89%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.36%

49.71%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.57%

31.57%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.77%

32.04%

-4.27%

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XPPT.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPPP.L vs. XPPT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPPP.L nor XPPT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPPP.L and XPPT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPPP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPPP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

Both ETFs track Platinum. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SPPP.L and 0.38% for XPPT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPPP.L and XPPT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer