SPPP.L vs. KF

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

SPPP.L (Invesco Physical Platinum) and KF (The Korea Fund Inc) are both funds - SPPP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while KF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Allianz Global Investors. Over the past 10 years, SPPP.L returned 3.71%/yr vs 16.80%/yr for KF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPPP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for KF.

Performance

SPPP.L vs. KF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPPP.L is traded in GBp, while KF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KF values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a -20.95% return, which is significantly lower than KF's 110.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP.L has underperformed KF with an annualized return of 3.71%, while KF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.

SPPP.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -17.86%
• YTD: -20.95%
• 6M: -28.29%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 3.71%

KF

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 110.71%
• 6M: 108.23%
• 1Y: 193.13%
• 3Y*: 47.84%
• 5Y*: 20.93%
• 10Y*: 16.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPPP.L vs. KF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum	-20.95%	104.81%	-8.43%	-10.70%	24.01%	-10.35%	7.05%	17.67%	-9.95%	-6.88%
KF The Korea Fund Inc	110.71%	85.15%	-17.88%	6.72%	-21.70%	9.47%	33.11%	2.77%	-14.47%	30.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SPPP.L and KF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014	0.19

Return for Risk

SPPP.L vs. KF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPPP.L

SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

KF

KF Risk / Return Rank: 95
KF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
KF Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
KF Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KF Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPPP.L vs. KF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPPP.L	KF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	4.39	-3.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	4.08	-3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.63	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	8.19	-7.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	27.67	-26.58

SPPP.L vs. KF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the KF Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and KF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPPP.L vs. KF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum KF drawdown of -66.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and KF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPPP.L	KF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.86%	-66.13%	+21.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.34%	-23.72%	-19.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.34%	-27.26%	-16.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.34%	-35.44%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.86%	-44.59%	-0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.34%	-6.27%	-37.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.62%	-18.21%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.23%	7.01%	+12.22%

Volatility

SPPP.L vs. KF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) is 10.41%, while The Korea Fund Inc (KF) has a volatility of 25.04%. This indicates that SPPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPPP.L	KF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.41%	25.04%	-14.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.73%	41.13%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.36%	44.34%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.57%	27.57%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.77%	25.69%	+2.08%

SPPP.L vs. KF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPPP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than KF's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPPP.L vs. KF - Dividend Comparison

SPPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KF The Korea Fund Inc	0.58%	1.20%	2.46%	0.00%	15.93%	26.50%	1.30%	0.24%	18.67%	9.75%	1.03%	13.66%
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPPP.L and KF in my portfolio?

SPPP.L and KF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.