PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPOL.L is traded in GBp, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOL.L achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than X7PS.L's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOL.L has underperformed X7PS.L with an annualized return of 9.66%, while X7PS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.47% annualized return.


SPOL.L

1D
2.66%
1M
2.02%
6M
16.21%
YTD
18.71%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
9.66%
ALL TIME*
0.98%

X7PS.L

1D
1.73%
1M
1.58%
6M
13.82%
YTD
15.85%
1Y
49.54%
3Y*
43.28%
5Y*
32.08%
10Y*
16.47%
ALL TIME*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
18.71%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%
X7PS.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
15.85%87.84%27.12%23.19%5.63%30.02%-18.45%7.52%-25.50%16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOL.L and X7PS.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2011

0.49

The correlation between SPOL.L and X7PS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (10 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPOL.L
X7PS.L

Financial Services

48.3%
100.0%

Energy

16.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%

-

Basic Materials

8.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Technology

2.0%

-

Industrials

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

SPOL.L
48.3%
X7PS.L
100.0%

Energy

SPOL.L
16.9%
X7PS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPOL.L
12.1%
X7PS.L

-

Basic Materials

SPOL.L
8.9%
X7PS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SPOL.L
5.1%
X7PS.L

-

Communication Services

SPOL.L
3.1%
X7PS.L

-

Technology

SPOL.L
2.0%
X7PS.L

-

Industrials

SPOL.L
1.9%
X7PS.L

-

Utilities

SPOL.L
1.7%
X7PS.L

-

Healthcare

SPOL.L

-

X7PS.L

-

Real Estate

SPOL.L

-

X7PS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PS.L
X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPOL.LX7PS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.07

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

10.25

-2.40

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOL.L and X7PS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOL.L drawdown since its inception was -67.31%, which is greater than X7PS.L's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOL.L and X7PS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOL.LX7PS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.31%

-56.34%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-16.07%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-18.22%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.27%

-30.73%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.64%

-56.34%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.46%

-14.48%

-26.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.82%

-0.66%

Volatility

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) is 5.38%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SPOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOL.LX7PS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

5.69%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

18.98%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

22.39%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.66%

23.70%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

24.62%

+2.71%

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOL.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOL.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPOL.L nor X7PS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPOL.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X7PS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR, while X7PS.L tracks STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SPOL.L and 0.20% for X7PS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOL.L and X7PS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer