PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPOG.L is traded in GBp, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOG.L achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.L's 32.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SPOG.L has underperformed XDW0.L with an annualized return of 8.27%, while XDW0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.


SPOG.L

1D
1.98%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
28.42%
6M
24.11%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
8.27%

XDW0.L

1D
2.15%
1M
0.78%
YTD
32.15%
6M
29.72%
1Y
47.45%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
20.61%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPOG.L
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
28.42%-0.88%0.57%-2.90%54.40%69.37%-33.93%4.75%-17.09%-12.48%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.15%6.49%3.89%-1.50%63.67%40.54%-32.44%5.86%-10.68%-3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOG.L and XDW0.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016

0.89

The correlation between SPOG.L and XDW0.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPOG.L
XDW0.L

Energy

100.0%
99.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

SPOG.L
100.0%
XDW0.L
99.9%

Basic Materials

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Communication Services

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Financial Services

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Healthcare

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Industrials

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Real Estate

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Technology

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Utilities

SPOG.L

-

XDW0.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOG.L
SPOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPOG.LXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.30

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

10.64

-4.80

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPOG.L and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPOG.LXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.31

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.87

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.41

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.43

-0.28

Drawdowns

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG.L drawdown since its inception was -76.49%, which is greater than XDW0.L's maximum drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG.L and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOG.LXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.49%

-59.07%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-14.30%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.87%

-21.61%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-22.02%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.97%

-59.07%

-12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-7.19%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.50%

-13.88%

-12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

4.45%

+1.92%

Volatility

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) at 7.95%. This indicates that SPOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOG.LXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

7.95%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.82%

17.22%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.20%

20.48%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.32%

23.73%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.94%

25.60%

+6.34%

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XDW0.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOG.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPOG.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPOG.L and XDW0.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDW0.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPOG.L and 0.25% for XDW0.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOG.L and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer