SPMV.L vs. IESU.L
SPMV.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMV.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD, while IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMV.L returned 10.00%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for IESU.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMV.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPMV.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMV.L achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 27.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMV.L has outperformed IESU.L with an annualized return of 10.00%, while IESU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
SPMV.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- YTD
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 22.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMV.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.44% | 11.55% | 18.68% | 9.94% | -11.05% | 24.98% | 7.41% | 31.25% | -5.35% | 16.05% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.45% | 9.98% | 3.69% | -1.00% | 63.91% | 52.43% | -33.64% | 9.60% | -18.29% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMV.L and IESU.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SPMV.L and IESU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPMV.L
IESU.L
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMV.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.19 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 5.63 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMV.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMV.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.34% | -72.57% | +39.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -16.37% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -22.55% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -27.74% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.34% | -66.85% | +33.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -9.64% | +9.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -24.89% | +21.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 6.39% | -4.80% |
Volatility
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) is 2.36%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that SPMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMV.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 7.49% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.39% | 21.04% | -14.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 23.95% | -15.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 29.48% | -16.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 29.81% | -16.04% |
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMV.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMV.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPMV.L nor IESU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMV.L and IESU.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMV.L.
SPMV.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPMV.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for SPMV.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer