PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPMV.L is traded in USD, while EWSP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EWSP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMV.L achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than EWSP.L's 11.71% return.


SPMV.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.14%
6M
4.46%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
9.98%

EWSP.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.90%
6M
8.40%
YTD
11.71%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.24%11.55%18.68%9.94%-3.30%
EWSP.L
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.71%11.87%12.06%13.48%-19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV.L and EWSP.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022

0.77

The correlation between SPMV.L and EWSP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EWSP.L
EWSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMV.LEWSP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.56

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

9.27

-2.66

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMV.L and EWSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than EWSP.L's maximum drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMV.L and EWSP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMV.LEWSP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-27.73%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-7.08%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-19.07%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.42%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-8.91%

+5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.96%

-0.37%

Volatility

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) is 1.82%, while iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that SPMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMV.LEWSP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

2.30%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

7.27%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

10.27%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

22.74%

-10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

22.74%

-8.97%

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPMV.L and EWSP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMV.L vs. EWSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPMV.L nor EWSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMV.L and EWSP.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV.L and EWSP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD, while EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMV.L and EWSP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer