SPMPX vs. CSUIX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

SPMPX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SPMPX returned 26.80%/yr vs 7.73%/yr for CSUIX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMPX charges 7.73%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.

Performance

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5 (SPMPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMPX achieves a 25.15% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 12.81% return.

SPMPX

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 25.15%
• 6M: 25.36%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 31.85%
• 5Y*: 26.80%
• 10Y*: —

CSUIX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 6M: 12.53%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 7.73%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SPMPX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5	25.15%	4.59%	47.63%	25.49%	38.13%	56.29%	-45.67%	-10.91%
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	12.81%	14.69%	8.74%	2.46%	-4.89%	16.60%	-1.29%	9.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMPX and CSUIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019	0.49

The correlation between SPMPX and CSUIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPMPX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMPX

SPMPX Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SPMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SPMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SPMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SPMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CSUIX

CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5 (SPMPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPMPX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.15	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.04	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.38	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	3.57	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	11.36	-3.02

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMPX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMPX drawdown since its inception was -81.60%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMPX and CSUIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPMPX	CSUIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.60%	-52.01%	-29.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.79%	-5.96%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-14.89%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	-20.01%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-0.51%	-5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.83%	-8.14%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	1.86%	+1.62%

Volatility

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5 (SPMPX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.65%. This indicates that SPMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPMPX	CSUIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	3.65%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	7.93%	+4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	9.91%	+6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.97%	12.96%	+12.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.66%	14.87%	+23.79%

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMPX has a 7.73% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPMPX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

SPMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than CSUIX's 7.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	7.46%	8.41%	2.58%	2.53%	3.91%	3.25%	1.64%	1.83%	2.45%	5.12%	2.35%	6.52%
SPMPX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class R5	4.84%	5.55%	4.32%	5.81%	6.70%	9.04%	22.32%	8.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPMPX and CSUIX in my portfolio?

SPMPX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPMPX or CSUIX?

SPMPX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to CSUIX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMPX dropped -81.60% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.