PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 21.65% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 14.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 20.24%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
0.44%
1M
-9.48%
6M
20.96%
YTD
21.65%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
37.58%
5Y*
20.52%
10Y*
20.24%
ALL TIME*
19.04%

VTV

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.70%
6M
10.51%
YTD
14.78%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.65%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.78%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and VTV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.61

The correlation between SPMO and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMO vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
VTV

Technology

54.0%
15.3%

Industrials

12.7%
14.3%

Communication Services

8.2%
2.9%

Healthcare

6.7%
15.2%

Financial Services

6.1%
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
8.7%

Energy

3.1%
6.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.0%

Utilities

1.2%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.5%

Technology

SPMO
54.0%
VTV
15.3%

Industrials

SPMO
12.7%
VTV
14.3%

Communication Services

SPMO
8.2%
VTV
2.9%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.7%
VTV
15.2%

Financial Services

SPMO
6.1%
VTV
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
VTV
8.7%

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
VTV
6.9%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.4%
VTV
3.0%

Utilities

SPMO
1.2%
VTV
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.2%
VTV
3.9%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.1%
VTV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.90

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

14.77

-7.36

SPMO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-59.27%

+28.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-6.35%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-14.52%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-17.04%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-36.78%

+5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.60%

-1.19%

-9.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.83%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

1.67%

+2.12%

Volatility

SPMO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.58%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.55%

2.58%

+8.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.23%

7.79%

+12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.65%

10.33%

+12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

13.82%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

16.61%

+4.23%

SPMO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than VTV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.89%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and VTV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to VTV (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.24% vs 12.25% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.24% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer