SPMO vs. SOXQ
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPMO returned 43.04%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 15.38% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and SOXQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SPMO and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
SOXQ
Industrials
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
SPMO
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Energy
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Utilities
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
SPMO
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
SOXQ
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.72 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 11.73 | -8.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 45.01 | -30.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 5.43 | -2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -46.01% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -15.59% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -39.36% | +19.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -12.96% | +8.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 4.06% | -0.80% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 7.35%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 13.44% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 26.70% | -12.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 33.78% | -16.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 36.38% | -17.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 36.38% | -16.07% |
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 43.04% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 43.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer