SPMO vs. NA.TO
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.08%/yr vs 19.52%/yr for NA.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPMO is traded in USD, while NA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than NA.TO's 17.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPMO having a 20.08% annualized return and NA.TO not far behind at 19.52%.
SPMO
- 1D
- -5.59%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 36.14%
- 3Y*
- 39.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
NA.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 54.69%
- 3Y*
- 31.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.52%
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.26% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 17.41% | 42.66% | 24.14% | 18.35% | -7.33% | 39.09% | 6.54% | 39.80% | -14.14% | 28.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and NA.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. NA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
NA.TO
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and National Bank of Canada (NA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 5.57 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 19.36 | -7.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 3.26 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | 0.82 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.59 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum NA.TO drawdown of -60.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and NA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -60.25% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -9.89% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -23.62% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -25.56% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -52.83% | +21.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -5.14% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -9.08% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.84% | +0.45% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) at 6.26%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.33% | 6.26% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 14.40% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 16.90% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 20.25% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 23.83% | -3.44% |
Dividends
SPMO vs. NA.TO - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than NA.TO's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.37% | 2.75% | 3.36% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and NA.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and NA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer