PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 30.35% return, which is significantly higher than GARP's 21.29% return.


SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%

GARP

1D
-0.72%
1M
11.92%
YTD
21.29%
6M
21.80%
1Y
43.57%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%23.98%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
21.29%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and GARP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020

0.83

The correlation between SPMO and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPMO vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
GARP

Technology

52.6%
56.7%

Industrials

11.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

9.2%
12.0%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.4%

Financial Services

5.9%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Energy

3.4%
2.7%

Utilities

2.8%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.4%

Technology

SPMO
52.6%
GARP
56.7%

Industrials

SPMO
11.3%
GARP
6.9%

Communication Services

SPMO
9.2%
GARP
12.0%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.7%
GARP
5.4%

Financial Services

SPMO
5.9%
GARP
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.3%
GARP

-

Energy

SPMO
3.4%
GARP
2.7%

Utilities

SPMO
2.8%
GARP
1.4%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
GARP
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
GARP
6.1%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.0%
GARP
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOGARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.45

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

3.18

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.20

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.17

12.85

+1.32

SPMO vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOGARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.45

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.93

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.90

+0.12

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-31.34%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-13.69%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-23.73%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-30.61%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.36%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.40%

-0.14%

Volatility

SPMO vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 5.03%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

5.03%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

13.89%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

17.89%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

21.97%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

23.89%

-3.58%

SPMO vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and GARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to GARP (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs GARP's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 20.26% for GARP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 20.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.25% for GARP.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.15% for GARP.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer