PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. CIVVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than CIVVX's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed CIVVX with an annualized return of 20.86%, while CIVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
4.23%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

CIVVX

1D
2.85%
1M
2.77%
YTD
5.33%
6M
7.90%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
CIVVX
Causeway International Value Fund
5.33%38.72%3.46%26.99%-6.99%8.86%5.16%19.81%-18.83%27.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and CIVVX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.48

The correlation between SPMO and CIVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. CIVVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CIVVX
CIVVX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CIVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CIVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOCIVVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.36

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

4.43

+8.57

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the CIVVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and CIVVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum CIVVX drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and CIVVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOCIVVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-61.07%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-16.20%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-17.31%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-28.60%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-45.13%

+14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-4.11%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-11.20%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

4.96%

-1.61%

Volatility

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Causeway International Value Fund (CIVVX) at 5.92%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOCIVVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

5.92%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

14.92%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

17.53%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

18.25%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

19.42%

+1.06%

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CIVVX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. CIVVX - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than CIVVX's 9.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIVVX
Causeway International Value Fund
9.11%9.59%9.07%3.39%1.54%1.60%1.11%4.41%3.31%1.73%1.69%1.70%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and CIVVX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to CIVVX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs CIVVX's -61.07%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and CIVVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer