SPMO vs. CHPS
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPMO returned 44.90% vs 202.19% for CHPS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
SPMO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 104.33% return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 18.12%
- YTD
- 104.33%
- 6M
- 111.24%
- 1Y
- 202.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 18.53% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 104.33% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and CHPS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SPMO and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPMO vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
CHPS
Industrials
SPMO
CHPS
Communication Services
SPMO
CHPS
Healthcare
SPMO
CHPS
-
Financial Services
SPMO
CHPS
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
CHPS
Energy
SPMO
CHPS
Utilities
SPMO
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
CHPS
Real Estate
SPMO
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
CHPS
SPMO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.69 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 11.29 | -7.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 42.06 | -29.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -39.44% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -17.50% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -1.75% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -9.13% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 4.69% | -1.34% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.27%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 19.27% | -8.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 32.12% | -15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 37.63% | -18.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 34.78% | -15.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 34.78% | -14.30% |
SPMO vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than CHPS's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and CHPS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.27%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 202.19% vs 44.90% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 202.19% return vs 44.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.33% for CHPS.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while CHPS is Semiconductors. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.25 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer