SPM.MI vs. FSG.L
SPM.MI (Saipem SpA) and FSG.L (Foresight Group Holdings Limited) are both stocks. SPM.MI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while FSG.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, SPM.MI returned -3.08%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for FSG.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPM.MI is traded in EUR, while FSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPM.MI achieves a 84.43% return, which is significantly higher than FSG.L's 3.32% return.
SPM.MI
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 84.43%
- 6M
- 89.67%
- 1Y
- 99.12%
- 3Y*
- 56.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- -5.72%
FSG.L
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPM.MI Saipem SpA | 84.43% | 4.55% | 70.68% | 30.38% | -75.67% | -21.34% |
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 3.32% | 4.96% | 4.70% | 5.68% | -2.94% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPM.MI and FSG.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPM.MI
FSG.L
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saipem SpA (SPM.MI) and Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPM.MI | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.09 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.75 | 0.36 | +6.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.06 | 0.86 | +16.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPM.MI | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 0.37 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.09 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPM.MI drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, which is greater than FSG.L's maximum drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPM.MI and FSG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPM.MI | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.52% | -42.24% | -57.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.69% | -28.23% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.10% | -42.24% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.70% | -42.24% | -47.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.02% | -15.13% | -80.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -13.53% | -30.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 11.76% | -5.95% |
Volatility
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Volatility Comparison
Saipem SpA (SPM.MI) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L) at 6.61%. This indicates that SPM.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPM.MI | FSG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 6.61% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.81% | 21.91% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.45% | 27.29% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.87% | 38.11% | +31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.82% | 37.84% | +19.98% |
Dividends
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Dividend Comparison
SPM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than FSG.L's 5.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 5.76% | 5.63% | 5.40% | 4.66% | 3.17% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
SPM.MI Saipem SpA | 3.95% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% |
Financials
SPM.MI vs. FSG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saipem SpA and Foresight Group Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SPM.MI and FSG.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SPM.MI and FSG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer