PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPLW.L is traded in USD, while SPEX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPEX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLW.L achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPEX.L's 9.35% return.


SPLW.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.54%
1Y
0.40%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
10Y*

SPEX.L

1D
0.52%
1M
3.88%
YTD
9.35%
6M
10.83%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
0.99%4.80%13.46%-0.49%-4.28%10.45%
SPEX.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
9.35%11.74%12.18%13.32%-11.74%8.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLW.L and SPEX.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.64

The correlation between SPLW.L and SPEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLW.L
SPEX.L

Utilities

26.8%
5.8%

Financial Services

16.6%
14.2%

Real Estate

14.8%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
6.5%

Industrials

10.2%
14.1%

Healthcare

6.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.9%

Technology

4.6%
20.1%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.9%

Energy

0.9%
4.2%

Communication Services

0.8%
3.9%

Utilities

SPLW.L
26.8%
SPEX.L
5.8%

Financial Services

SPLW.L
16.6%
SPEX.L
14.2%

Real Estate

SPLW.L
14.8%
SPEX.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPLW.L
10.8%
SPEX.L
6.5%

Industrials

SPLW.L
10.2%
SPEX.L
14.1%

Healthcare

SPLW.L
6.8%
SPEX.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLW.L
5.7%
SPEX.L
9.9%

Technology

SPLW.L
4.6%
SPEX.L
20.1%

Basic Materials

SPLW.L
2.0%
SPEX.L
3.9%

Energy

SPLW.L
0.9%
SPEX.L
4.2%

Communication Services

SPLW.L
0.8%
SPEX.L
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLW.L
SPLW.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEX.L
SPEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLW.LSPEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.33

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

2.80

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

10.17

-10.04

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLW.L and SPEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLW.LSPEX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

1.92

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.70

-0.30

Drawdowns

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum SPEX.L drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLW.L and SPEX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLW.LSPEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-21.53%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-7.08%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.67%

-18.27%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

0.00%

-6.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.20%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.95%

+1.08%

Volatility

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) at 2.13%. This indicates that SPLW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLW.LSPEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.13%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

7.11%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

10.30%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

15.62%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.26%

16.11%

-3.85%

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEX.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLW.L vs. SPEX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPLW.L nor SPEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLW.L and SPEX.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPEX.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEX.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.

SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index, while SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLW.L and 0.20% for SPEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLW.L and SPEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer