PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 8.36%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.29%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.17%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
8.36%

VBR

1D
0.87%
1M
4.49%
YTD
14.60%
6M
12.92%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
5.23%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.60%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and VBR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.65

The correlation between SPLV and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
VBR

Utilities

24.9%
4.8%

Financial Services

21.3%
17.6%

Real Estate

17.8%
10.1%

Industrials

12.2%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
4.0%

Healthcare

4.0%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
12.4%

Energy

2.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.3%

Technology

0.8%
10.6%

Communication Services

0.8%
2.5%

Utilities

SPLV
24.9%
VBR
4.8%

Financial Services

SPLV
21.3%
VBR
17.6%

Real Estate

SPLV
17.8%
VBR
10.1%

Industrials

SPLV
12.2%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
9.4%
VBR
4.0%

Healthcare

SPLV
4.0%
VBR
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
4.0%
VBR
12.4%

Energy

SPLV
2.7%
VBR
5.2%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.1%
VBR
6.3%

Technology

SPLV
0.8%
VBR
10.6%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.8%
VBR
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLVVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.31

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.17

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

11.22

-9.91

SPLV vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-61.98%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-8.85%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-24.19%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-24.19%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-45.28%

+9.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

0.00%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-8.26%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.50%

+0.65%

Volatility

SPLV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 4.01%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.43%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

10.65%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

15.36%

-5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

19.79%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

21.74%

-6.36%

SPLV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than VBR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.14%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and VBR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SPLV (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.99% vs 8.36% for SPLV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.71% for VBR.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer