SPLV vs. PMMY
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and PMMY (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while PMMY is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. SPLV is passively managed, while PMMY is actively managed. Over the past year, SPLV returned -0.03% vs 5.98% for PMMY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMMY.
Performance
SPLV vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PMMY's 2.19% return.
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
PMMY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 0.23% |
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 2.19% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and PMMY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
PMMY
SPLV vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLV | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 2.45 | -1.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 16.90 | -16.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 89.69 | -89.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLV | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 5.35 | -5.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 4.56 | -3.88 |
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and PMMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -0.36% | -35.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -0.36% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -0.04% | -6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -0.04% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 0.07% | +2.98% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.36%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 0.36% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 0.87% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 1.12% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 1.39% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 1.39% | +13.97% |
SPLV vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLV vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while PMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and PMMY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs PMMY's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, PMMY leads with 5.98% vs -0.03% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMMY has performed better with a 5.98% return vs -0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMMY.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for PMMY.
SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while PMMY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.50% for PMMY.
PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and PMMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer