PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 13.06% return.


SPLV

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.01%

NVDY

1D
-2.22%
1M
5.54%
YTD
13.06%
6M
17.67%
1Y
46.64%
3Y*
54.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.32%4.10%13.93%0.68%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
13.06%27.38%114.23%42.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and NVDY is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023

-0.09

The correlation between SPLV and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.29

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

3.66

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

9.00

-9.01

SPLV vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

1.72

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.64

-0.96

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-34.08%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-12.81%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-34.08%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-6.66%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-6.15%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

5.20%

-2.15%

Volatility

SPLV vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 2.97%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

9.46%

-6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

20.68%

-13.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

27.35%

-17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

38.24%

-25.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

38.24%

-22.88%

SPLV vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPLV vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than NVDY's 61.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
61.36%83.10%83.65%22.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.22%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and NVDY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to SPLV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 54.54% vs 7.54% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 54.54% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 61.36%, compared with 2.22% for SPLV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer