SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPLT.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF) and XBAL.TO (iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLT.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton Funds, while XBAL.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPLT.TO returned 5.81% vs 17.48% for XBAL.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLT.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XBAL.TO.

Performance

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF (SPLT.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLT.TO achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than XBAL.TO's 7.81% return.

SPLT.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBAL.TO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 17.48%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 8.15%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPLT.TO Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF	2.84%	5.80%	14.11%	5.46%
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio	7.81%	11.87%	15.76%	5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.17

The correlation between SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPLT.TO	XBAL.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	20.5%
Basic Materials	-	7.4%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Energy	-	7.5%
Healthcare	-	6.6%
Industrials	-	12.4%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Technology	-	21.6%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLT.TO

SPLT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
SPLT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPLT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SPLT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SPLT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPLT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XBAL.TO

XBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 61
XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
XBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF (SPLT.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPLT.TO	XBAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.06	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.87	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.89	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	12.15	-3.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPLT.TO	XBAL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	2.06	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	0.68	+1.37

Drawdowns

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLT.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, smaller than the maximum XBAL.TO drawdown of -28.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPLT.TO	XBAL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-28.83%	+23.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-6.06%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.36%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-3.39%	+2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	1.44%	-0.76%

Volatility

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF (SPLT.TO) is 0.74%, while iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that SPLT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPLT.TO	XBAL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	3.14%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.25%	7.21%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	8.51%	-5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.67%	8.79%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.67%	9.37%	-4.70%

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLT.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPLT.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

SPLT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than XBAL.TO's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPLT.TO Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF	5.99%	6.01%	5.99%	3.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio	2.10%	2.24%	2.68%	2.40%	2.09%	1.74%	1.99%	2.26%	3.39%	2.93%	3.64%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO in my portfolio?

SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPLT.TO or XBAL.TO?

On fees, XBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPLT.TO or XBAL.TO?

XBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPLT.TO.

What is the main difference between SPLT.TO and XBAL.TO?

SPLT.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XBAL.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPLT.TO and 0.20% for XBAL.TO.