SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L
SPLT.L (iShares Physical Platinum ETC) and ESGP.L (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Precious Metals funds - SPLT.L tracks the Platinum while ESGP.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPLT.L returned 18.81%/yr vs 33.61%/yr for ESGP.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLT.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.L.
Performance
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLT.L achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.L's 2.21% return.
SPLT.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
ESGP.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 62.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLT.L iShares Physical Platinum ETC | -5.28% | 104.63% | -8.37% | -10.78% | 23.96% | -10.20% |
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 2.21% | 136.71% | 3.17% | -0.39% | 2.14% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLT.L and ESGP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SPLT.L and ESGP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLT.L
ESGP.L
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLT.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.18 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 5.45 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLT.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.53 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.60 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than ESGP.L's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLT.L and ESGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLT.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -36.54% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.87% | -28.67% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.87% | -28.67% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -24.33% | -8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -13.50% | -20.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 11.48% | +4.93% |
Volatility
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Platinum ETC (SPLT.L) is 10.95%, while HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that SPLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLT.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 15.32% | -4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 32.59% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.08% | 40.84% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 33.19% | -2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 33.19% | -5.27% |
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLT.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLT.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLT.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLT.L and ESGP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLT.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLT.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.L.
SPLT.L tracks Platinum, while ESGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPLT.L and 0.60% for ESGP.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLT.L and ESGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer