SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L
SPLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPMD.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both S&P 500 funds - SPLG.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index while SPMD.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLG.L returned 6.37%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for SPMD.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPMD.L.
Performance
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPLG.L is traded in GBp, while SPMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLG.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD.L's 4.48% return.
SPLG.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.03%
SPMD.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.76%
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 7.42% | -2.34% | 15.31% | -5.86% | 6.95% | -18.01% |
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.48% | 3.64% | 20.83% | 4.26% | -0.33% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLG.L and SPMD.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPLG.L and SPMD.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Financial Services
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Real Estate
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Industrials
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Consumer Defensive
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Healthcare
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Energy
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Basic Materials
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Technology
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Communication Services
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLG.L
SPMD.L
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLG.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.95 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 5.74 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, which is greater than SPMD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLG.L and SPMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLG.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.94% | -25.11% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -5.16% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -14.33% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -14.33% | -6.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -1.52% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -3.79% | -9.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 1.76% | +1.45% |
Volatility
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that SPLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLG.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 2.65% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 7.29% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 9.65% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 12.70% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 14.63% | +7.86% |
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLG.L vs. SPMD.L - Dividend Comparison
SPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.16% | 1.15% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 1.35% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.52% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLG.L and SPMD.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLG.L.
SPLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLG.L and 0.20% for SPMD.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLG.L and SPMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer