SPLG.L vs. IITU.L
SPLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPLG.L returned 6.37%/yr vs 21.08%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPLG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLG.L achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 15.62% return.
SPLG.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.03%
IITU.L
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.26%
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLG.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 7.42% | -2.34% | 15.31% | -5.86% | 6.95% | -18.01% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.62% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 16.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLG.L and IITU.L is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SPLG.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLG.L
IITU.L
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Financial Services
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
SPLG.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SPLG.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
SPLG.L
IITU.L
-
Technology
SPLG.L
IITU.L
Communication Services
SPLG.L
IITU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPLG.L
IITU.L
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.73 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 4.14 | -1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.94%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -41.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLG.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.94% | -41.09% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -16.76% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -28.03% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -28.03% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -8.91% | +7.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -8.10% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 7.01% | -3.80% |
Volatility
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPLG.L) is 3.98%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that SPLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLG.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 7.33% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 16.37% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 21.39% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 26.39% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 23.72% | -1.23% |
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLG.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPLG.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLG.L and IITU.L have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLG.L.
SPLG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SPLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLG.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SPLG.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer