PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLB vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLB vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLB has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 2.20%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.92% annualized return.


SPLB

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.42%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.81%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
-2.10%
10Y*
2.20%

MUB

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.80%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLB vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.42%7.05%-1.74%11.20%-25.68%-1.99%13.47%23.49%-7.35%12.26%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
1.28%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.02%5.12%7.06%0.93%4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLB and MUB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009

0.54

The correlation between SPLB and MUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLB vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLB
SPLB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLB vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPLBMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.22

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

7.77

-5.13

SPLB vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLB and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPLB vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLBMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-13.68%

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-2.79%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-5.34%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

-11.88%

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-13.68%

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.11%

-0.66%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.23%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.80%

+1.41%

Volatility

SPLB vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 1.01%. This indicates that SPLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLBMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

1.01%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

2.25%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.07%

2.90%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

4.06%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.95%

4.92%

+8.03%

SPLB vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPLB and MUB have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLB vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than MUB's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.17%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.35%5.25%5.20%4.60%4.53%3.00%3.01%3.79%4.50%4.06%4.34%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLB and MUB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLB has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to MUB (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs MUB's -13.68%.

On 10-year performance, SPLB leads with 2.20% vs 1.92% for MUB. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, MUB has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPLB has performed better with a 2.20% return vs 1.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLB and MUB have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.17% for MUB.

SPLB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while MUB is Municipal Bonds. SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLB and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer