SPLB vs. IGCB
SPLB (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF) and IGCB (TCW Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SPLB tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index while IGCB tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPLB returned 7.56% vs 5.37% for IGCB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPLB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IGCB.
Performance
SPLB vs. IGCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLB achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than IGCB's 0.08% return.
SPLB
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
IGCB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLB vs. IGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.92% | 7.05% | -1.79% |
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | 0.08% | 8.42% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLB and IGCB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SPLB and IGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLB vs. IGCB — Risk / Return Rank
SPLB
IGCB
SPLB vs. IGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) and TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLB | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.85 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 5.69 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLB | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.38 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.09 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
SPLB vs. IGCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLB drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than IGCB's maximum drawdown of -4.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLB and IGCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLB | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.46% | -4.20% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -2.91% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.53% | -1.31% | -13.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -0.93% | -7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 0.95% | +1.23% |
Volatility
SPLB vs. IGCB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) at 1.35%. This indicates that SPLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLB | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 1.35% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.81% | 2.78% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 3.92% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 4.82% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 4.82% | +8.13% |
SPLB vs. IGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IGCB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLB vs. IGCB - Dividend Comparison
SPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than IGCB's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | 4.75% | 4.52% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.38% | 5.25% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLB and IGCB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLB has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to IGCB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLB dropped -34.46% vs IGCB's -4.20%.
On 1-year performance, SPLB leads with 7.56% vs 5.37% for IGCB. On fees, SPLB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPLB has performed better with a 7.56% return vs 5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IGCB.
SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 4.75% for IGCB.
SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index, while IGCB tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPLB and 0.35% for IGCB.
IGCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLB and IGCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer