PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIP vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIP vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.


SPIP

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.80%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
2.49%

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIP vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
0.72%6.78%2.35%2.14%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.94%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIP and IBID is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between SPIP and IBID has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIP vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIP
SPIP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SPIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIP vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIPIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.72

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

7.20

-5.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

29.14

-24.26

SPIP vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIP and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIP vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIPIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-1.28%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-0.55%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-0.55%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-0.22%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.13%

+0.58%

Volatility

SPIP vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that SPIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIPIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.35%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

0.86%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

1.23%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

2.24%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

2.24%

+3.77%

SPIP vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIP vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPIP
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF
4.79%4.09%3.36%3.70%7.05%4.53%1.97%2.91%2.80%3.02%1.88%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIP and IBID have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPIP has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIP dropped -15.39% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.92% vs 3.45% for SPIP. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SPIP.

SPIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

SPIP tracks Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SPIP and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIP and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer