PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPINX vs. SLDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPINX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than SLDBX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SPINX has outperformed SLDBX with an annualized return of 14.85%, while SLDBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.13% annualized return.


SPINX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.55%
6M
7.77%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
14.85%
ALL TIME*
13.71%

SLDBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.21%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.13%
ALL TIME*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPINX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund
9.32%17.89%24.02%26.24%-18.27%28.62%18.35%31.42%-4.46%21.74%
SLDBX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund
0.84%5.89%4.06%4.35%-4.09%-0.17%4.02%3.97%1.81%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPINX and SLDBX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014

-0.03

The correlation between SPINX and SLDBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPINX vs. SLDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPINX
SPINX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SLDBX
SLDBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPINXSLDBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.08

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

12.11

-3.23

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SLDBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPINX and SLDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPINX drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than SLDBX's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPINX and SLDBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPINXSLDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-6.12%

-27.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-1.23%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.91%

-1.23%

-31.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.91%

-6.12%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-6.12%

-27.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-0.21%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-0.70%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.31%

+1.77%

Volatility

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund (SPINX) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) at 0.42%. This indicates that SPINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPINXSLDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

0.42%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

1.54%

+8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

2.01%

+10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

2.29%

+20.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

1.85%

+19.11%

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPINX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLDBX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPINX vs. SLDBX - Dividend Comparison

SPINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than SLDBX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLDBX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund
3.90%4.34%3.75%2.85%1.30%1.24%2.75%2.77%2.30%1.59%1.44%1.27%
SPINX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust S&P 500 Index Fund
10.94%11.90%26.02%9.77%9.59%6.58%3.58%3.01%4.94%2.32%1.97%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPINX and SLDBX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPINX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to SLDBX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPINX dropped -33.82% vs SLDBX's -6.12%.

SLDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPINX and SLDBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer