SLDBX vs. CAVAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SLDBX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund) and CAVAX (SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - SLDBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by SEI, while CAVAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by SEI. Over the past 10 years, SLDBX returned 2.13%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for CAVAX. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SLDBX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CAVAX.

Performance

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLDBX achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than CAVAX's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SLDBX has underperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.

SLDBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.48%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 1Y: 2.98%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 2.13%
• ALL TIME*: 2.01%

CAVAX

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 2.08%
• 6M: 7.79%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 19.90%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: 11.86%
• ALL TIME*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CAVAX SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SLDBX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLDBX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund	0.84%	5.89%	4.06%	4.35%	-4.09%	-0.17%	4.02%	3.97%	1.81%	1.30%
CAVAX SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund	10.15%	15.45%	16.72%	21.33%	-18.51%	20.57%	17.33%	26.63%	-10.24%	23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDBX and CAVAX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.00

The correlation between SLDBX and CAVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLDBX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLDBX

SLDBX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SLDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SLDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SLDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SLDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SLDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CAVAX

CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLDBX	CAVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.41	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.01	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.25	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.07	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.11	8.56	+3.55

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDBX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDBX drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum CAVAX drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDBX and CAVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLDBX	CAVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	-36.55%	+30.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.23%	-8.49%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.23%	-17.95%	+16.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.12%	-26.51%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.12%	-36.55%	+30.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-5.01%	+4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	2.06%	-1.75%

Volatility

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) is 0.42%, while SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SLDBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLDBX	CAVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	3.51%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.54%	9.66%	-8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	12.48%	-10.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.29%	16.16%	-13.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.85%	17.31%	-15.46%

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLDBX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

SLDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than CAVAX's 6.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAVAX SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund	6.11%	6.73%	7.01%	1.29%	3.67%	16.58%	2.98%	2.80%	5.66%	0.71%	0.99%	0.00%
SLDBX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund	3.90%	4.34%	3.75%	2.85%	1.30%	1.24%	2.75%	2.77%	2.30%	1.59%	1.44%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLDBX and CAVAX in my portfolio?

SLDBX and CAVAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLDBX or CAVAX?

CAVAX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to SLDBX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDBX dropped -6.12% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.