PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLDBX vs. CAVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLDBX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than CAVAX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SLDBX has underperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 2.17%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


SLDBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.27%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
2.17%

CAVAX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.35%
YTD
9.32%
6M
10.43%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLDBX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund
0.80%5.89%4.06%4.35%-4.09%-0.17%4.02%3.97%1.81%1.30%
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
9.32%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDBX and CAVAX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.00

The correlation between SLDBX and CAVAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLDBX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDBX
SLDBX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SLDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLDBXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.96

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

2.75

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.69

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

11.48

+3.67

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDBX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLDBXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.96

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.56

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

0.70

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.69

+0.47

Drawdowns

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDBX drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum CAVAX drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDBX and CAVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLDBXCAVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-36.55%

+30.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.23%

-8.49%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.23%

-17.95%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.12%

-26.51%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.12%

-36.55%

+30.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-5.06%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

1.99%

-1.68%

Volatility

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund (SLDBX) is 0.62%, while SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that SLDBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLDBXCAVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

2.90%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

8.90%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

11.82%

-9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

16.08%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

17.39%

-15.55%

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLDBX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLDBX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

SLDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than CAVAX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.16%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
SLDBX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Limited Duration Bond Fund
4.27%4.34%3.75%2.85%1.30%1.24%2.75%2.77%2.30%1.59%1.44%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLDBX and CAVAX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAVAX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SLDBX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDBX dropped -6.12% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

SLDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLDBX and CAVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer