PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
0.57%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
-4.41%17.39%24.40%26.11%-18.52%28.48%17.92%30.91%-4.78%21.38%
Different Trading Currencies

SPHQ is traded in USD, while ZSP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZSP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's -7.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPHQ having a 13.53% annualized return and ZSP.TO not far behind at 13.32%.


SPHQ

1D
2.36%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
0.57%
6M
3.29%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
13.53%

ZSP.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
-7.01%
6M
-4.79%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQZSP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.77

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.19

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.45

5.57

+0.87

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and ZSP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQZSP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.64

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.80

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and ZSP.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than ZSP.TO's 0.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.19%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.87%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.44%1.47%1.63%1.63%2.20%1.53%

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and ZSP.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-26.94%

-30.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-12.43%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-22.25%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-26.94%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-6.12%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-3.37%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

3.33%

-0.88%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) at 4.27%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPHQZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.27%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

9.00%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

18.25%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.89%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

18.07%

-0.26%