PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
0.57%13.25%5.58%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.


SPHQ

1D
2.36%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
0.57%
6M
3.29%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
13.53%

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPHQ vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.23

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.86

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.71

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.45

9.81

-3.36

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.23

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.02

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and BUFP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.19%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-11.98%

-45.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-8.16%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-2.54%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-1.08%

-9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.42%

+1.03%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.41%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPHQBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

3.41%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

4.99%

+4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

11.11%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

9.79%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

9.79%

+8.02%