SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA
SPGP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L returned 13.80%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for CSH.PA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPGP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.
Performance
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPGP.L is traded in GBp, while CSH.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSH.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP.L achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than CSH.PA's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 13.80%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.
SPGP.L
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 52.23%
- 3Y*
- 36.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -5.80% | 137.41% | 12.81% | 3.72% | -0.45% | -9.15% | 19.43% | 41.00% | -4.37% | -2.80% |
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | -0.01% | 7.72% | -1.02% | 1.16% | 5.11% | -6.54% | 7.70% | -6.25% | 0.43% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP.L and CSH.PA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011 | 0.11 |
The correlation between SPGP.L and CSH.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP.L
CSH.PA
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGP.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.37 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 5.18 | -0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP.L drawdown since its inception was -86.56%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP.L and CSH.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.56% | -27.56% | -59.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.69% | -1.96% | -31.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.69% | -3.28% | -30.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -4.89% | -29.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.71% | -11.66% | -32.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.46% | -1.30% | -28.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -10.49% | -49.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.81% | 0.90% | +10.91% |
Volatility
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 1.04%. This indicates that SPGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.22% | 1.04% | +12.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.40% | 2.65% | +30.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.37% | 4.01% | +37.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 5.37% | +29.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 7.11% | +26.84% |
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGP.L vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPGP.L nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 2.60% |
SPGP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGP.L and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPGP.L.
SPGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while CSH.PA is Money Market. SPGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPGP.L and 0.10% for CSH.PA.
Find the right allocation for SPGP.L and CSH.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer