SPGP.L vs. COPX
SPGP.L (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L returned 13.80%/yr vs 22.49%/yr for COPX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPGP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPGP.L is traded in GBp, while COPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP.L achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP.L has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.49% annualized return.
SPGP.L
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 52.23%
- 3Y*
- 36.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
COPX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 28.81%
- 1Y
- 106.99%
- 3Y*
- 31.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.52%
- 10Y*
- 22.49%
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -5.80% | 137.41% | 12.81% | 3.72% | -0.45% | -9.15% | 19.43% | 41.00% | -4.37% | -2.80% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 20.36% | 79.71% | 5.38% | 2.96% | 11.04% | 24.55% | 47.20% | 8.20% | -27.23% | 26.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP.L and COPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, SPGP.L and COPX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGP.L
COPX
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SPGP.L
COPX
Industrials
SPGP.L
COPX
Communication Services
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Energy
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Technology
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Utilities
SPGP.L
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP.L vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP.L
COPX
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGP.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.98 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 12.54 | -8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP.L drawdown since its inception was -86.56%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -81.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP.L and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.56% | -81.19% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.69% | -27.06% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.69% | -40.03% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -40.03% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.71% | -59.06% | +15.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.46% | -9.65% | -19.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -34.96% | -25.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.81% | 8.56% | +3.25% |
Volatility
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (SPGP.L) is 13.22%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 18.35%. This indicates that SPGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.22% | 18.35% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.40% | 35.74% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.37% | 41.09% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 33.61% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 33.37% | +0.58% |
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGP.L vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
SPGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SPGP.L iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGP.L and COPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPGP.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPGP.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
SPGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while COPX is Materials. SPGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SPGP.L and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for SPGP.L and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer