SPGBX vs. UDBPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPGBX (Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund) and UDBPX (UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SPGBX returned 0.08%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for UDBPX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPGBX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UDBPX.

Performance

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) and UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGBX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than UDBPX's -0.05% return.

SPGBX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 3.90%
• 5Y*: 0.08%
• 10Y*: —

UDBPX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 3.20%
• 3Y*: 3.55%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SPGBX Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund	0.55%	4.42%	1.26%	8.39%	-12.91%	-2.25%	5.42%	6.33%	2.84%
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund	-0.05%	6.96%	1.55%	4.53%	-10.41%	-2.43%	6.80%	6.79%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGBX and UDBPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018	0.83

The correlation between SPGBX and UDBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPGBX vs. UDBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGBX

SPGBX Risk / Return Rank: 21
SPGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SPGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SPGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SPGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
SPGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

UDBPX

UDBPX Risk / Return Rank: 20
UDBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
UDBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
UDBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UDBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
UDBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) and UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPGBX	UDBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.16	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.78	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.79	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.42	5.42	-0.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the UDBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGBX and UDBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPGBX	UDBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.16	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.05	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.43	-0.05

Drawdowns

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGBX drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, which is greater than UDBPX's maximum drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGBX and UDBPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPGBX	UDBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.02%	-15.45%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.38%	-2.25%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.99%	-4.03%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.67%	-14.55%	-2.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-1.54%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-5.10%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.72%	+0.10%

Volatility

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Volatility Comparison

Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) and UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPGBX	UDBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	1.05%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.14%	2.35%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74%	3.47%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.77%	4.99%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.31%	4.50%	-0.19%

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than UDBPX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPGBX vs. UDBPX - Dividend Comparison

SPGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than UDBPX's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SPGBX Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund	3.71%	4.18%	4.86%	3.30%	1.59%	2.05%	1.35%	2.75%	1.20%
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund	3.61%	3.12%	2.84%	2.15%	1.46%	1.03%	4.11%	2.69%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPGBX and UDBPX in my portfolio?

SPGBX and UDBPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPGBX or UDBPX?

SPGBX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to UDBPX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGBX dropped -17.02% vs UDBPX's -15.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.