PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGBX vs. PYGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGBX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than PYGSX's 0.64% return.


SPGBX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*

PYGSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPGBX
Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund
0.55%4.42%1.26%8.39%-12.91%-2.25%5.42%6.33%2.84%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
0.64%5.72%5.19%5.61%-3.38%0.17%3.14%4.77%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGBX and PYGSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018

0.61

The correlation between SPGBX and PYGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGBX vs. PYGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGBX
SPGBX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SPGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGSX
PYGSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PYGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGBXPYGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.58

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

4.17

-2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.60

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.30

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.44

13.07

-8.63

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the PYGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGBX and PYGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGBXPYGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.58

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.38

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

2.08

-1.70

Drawdowns

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGBX drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, which is greater than PYGSX's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGBX and PYGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGBXPYGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.02%

-7.29%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-1.23%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-1.23%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-5.38%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-0.35%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-0.49%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.31%

+0.50%

Volatility

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Volatility Comparison

Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund (SPGBX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) at 0.48%. This indicates that SPGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGBXPYGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.48%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

1.11%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

1.54%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.77%

1.88%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

1.75%

+2.56%

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PYGSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGBX vs. PYGSX - Dividend Comparison

SPGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than PYGSX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
4.65%4.63%4.64%3.84%2.14%1.68%1.78%2.74%2.51%1.68%1.19%1.20%
SPGBX
Symmetry Panoramic Global Fixed Income Fund
3.71%4.18%4.86%3.30%1.59%2.05%1.35%2.75%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGBX and PYGSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGBX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to PYGSX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGBX dropped -17.02% vs PYGSX's -7.29%.

PYGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGBX and PYGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer