SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L
SPEX.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) and IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPEX.L returned 9.30%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for IUCM.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPEX.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCM.L.
Performance
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPEX.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEX.L achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 0.46% return.
SPEX.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- —
IUCM.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEX.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 9.11% | 3.90% | 14.09% | 7.64% | -1.17% | 28.05% |
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.46% | 17.47% | 41.41% | 47.96% | -33.47% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEX.L and IUCM.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SPEX.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Technology
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
Financial Services
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Industrials
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Healthcare
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Real Estate
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Utilities
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Energy
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Basic Materials
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
-
Communication Services
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPEX.L
IUCM.L
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 2.51 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 8.34 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.43 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.63 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEX.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEX.L and IUCM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -38.32% | +18.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | -8.21% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -20.74% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -38.32% | +18.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.85% | +5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -8.24% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 2.47% | -0.70% |
Volatility
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) is 1.96%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that SPEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 4.38% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | 10.40% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 14.36% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 19.48% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 20.24% | -5.63% |
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEX.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPEX.L nor IUCM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEX.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEX.L.
SPEX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPEX.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.
Find the right allocation for SPEX.L and IUCM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer