PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEU vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEU vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEU achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 11.77% return.


SPEU

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.14%
6M
5.09%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
9.87%
ALL TIME*
7.02%

FLGB

1D
-0.59%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.65%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.68M$2.31M$3.65M
$1.27M$1.33M$1.75M

SPEU vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
9.83%35.80%1.93%19.85%-15.97%16.20%6.35%26.15%-13.79%1.17%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
11.77%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEU and FLGB is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.87

The correlation between SPEU and FLGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEU vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEU
FLGB

Financial Services

23.7%
25.5%

Industrials

20.2%
14.4%

Healthcare

12.6%
13.8%

Technology

9.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
4.9%

Basic Materials

5.3%
8.2%

Energy

4.6%
10.0%

Utilities

4.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

SPEU
23.7%
FLGB
25.5%

Industrials

SPEU
20.2%
FLGB
14.4%

Healthcare

SPEU
12.6%
FLGB
13.8%

Technology

SPEU
9.8%
FLGB
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPEU
8.0%
FLGB
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEU
7.1%
FLGB
4.9%

Basic Materials

SPEU
5.3%
FLGB
8.2%

Energy

SPEU
4.6%
FLGB
10.0%

Utilities

SPEU
4.5%
FLGB
5.0%

Communication Services

SPEU
2.8%
FLGB
2.5%

Real Estate

SPEU
1.5%
FLGB
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEU vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPEU
SPEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPEU vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEUFLGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.50

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

8.38

-1.25

SPEU vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEU and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEU vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEU drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEU and FLGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEUFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-42.61%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-10.26%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-13.13%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

-25.90%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.59%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-6.62%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.05%

+0.17%

Volatility

SPEU vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF (SPEU) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEUFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.55%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

12.83%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

14.78%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

16.59%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

18.91%

-0.76%

SPEU vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEU has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEU vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

SPEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than FLGB's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
2.84%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
3.37%3.47%3.29%2.91%3.08%2.67%2.29%3.19%3.99%2.82%3.66%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEU and FLGB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SPEU (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEU dropped -62.45% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 12.51% vs 9.09% for SPEU. On fees, SPEU is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEU is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGB.

SPEU has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 2.84% for FLGB.

SPEU tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPEU and 0.09% for FLGB.

FLGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEU and FLGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer