SPES.L vs. XSXG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and XSXG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both S&P 500 funds - SPES.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while XSXG.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPES.L returned 12.30%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for XSXG.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPES.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for XSXG.L.

Performance

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPES.L is traded in GBp, while XSXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XSXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPES.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than XSXG.L's 10.62% return.

SPES.L

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —

XSXG.L

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 6.01%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 29.30%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist	9.18%	3.95%	13.66%	8.18%	5.70%
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	10.62%	9.55%	27.53%	20.03%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPES.L and XSXG.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022	0.81

The correlation between SPES.L and XSXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPES.L

SPES.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SPES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SPES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SPES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XSXG.L

XSXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XSXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XSXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XSXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XSXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPES.L	XSXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.77	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	3.70	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.52	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.01	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.59	14.46	-2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPES.L and XSXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPES.L	XSXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.77	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.27	-0.47

Drawdowns

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPES.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum XSXG.L drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPES.L and XSXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPES.L	XSXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-21.10%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-7.27%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.65%	-21.10%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.22%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-3.44%	-0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	2.02%	-0.26%

Volatility

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) is 2.04%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that SPES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPES.L	XSXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.61%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.43%	7.18%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	10.58%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	13.91%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	13.91%	+0.80%

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPES.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSXG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPES.L vs. XSXG.L - Dividend Comparison

SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than XSXG.L's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist	1.28%	1.37%	1.36%	1.48%	1.49%	0.74%
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D	0.82%	0.92%	1.11%	1.30%	0.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPES.L and XSXG.L in my portfolio?

SPES.L and XSXG.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPES.L or XSXG.L?

On fees, XSXG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPES.L or XSXG.L?

XSXG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.

What is the main difference between SPES.L and XSXG.L?

SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XSXG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPES.L and 0.07% for XSXG.L.