SPES.L vs. IUUS.L
SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and IUUS.L (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - SPES.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while IUUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPES.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for IUUS.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPES.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUUS.L.
Performance
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPES.L is traded in GBp, while IUUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPES.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than IUUS.L's 3.98% return.
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IUUS.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.18% | 3.95% | 13.66% | 8.18% | -1.34% | 28.07% |
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.98% | 7.55% | 25.06% | -12.65% | 14.20% | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPES.L and IUUS.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SPES.L and IUUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPES.L
IUUS.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Financial Services
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Industrials
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Healthcare
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Real Estate
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Utilities
SPES.L
IUUS.L
Energy
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Basic Materials
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Communication Services
SPES.L
IUUS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPES.L
IUUS.L
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.13 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 1.17 | +2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 2.56 | +9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.74 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.59 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.42 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPES.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum IUUS.L drawdown of -29.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPES.L and IUUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -29.76% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -9.52% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -13.84% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -29.76% | +10.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.90% | +6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -8.79% | +4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 4.37% | -2.61% |
Volatility
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) is 2.04%, while iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that SPES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPES.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 5.33% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 12.58% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 15.12% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 17.19% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 18.71% | -4.00% |
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPES.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPES.L vs. IUUS.L - Dividend Comparison
SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPES.L and IUUS.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.
SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IUUS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPES.L and 0.15% for IUUS.L.
Find the right allocation for SPES.L and IUUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer