SPES.L vs. IITU.L
SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPES.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPES.L returned 9.32%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPES.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPES.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.18% | 3.95% | 13.66% | 8.18% | -1.34% | 28.07% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 26.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPES.L and IITU.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPES.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPES.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SPES.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
SPES.L
IITU.L
Healthcare
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
SPES.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
SPES.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPES.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPES.L
IITU.L
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPES.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.17 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 8.17 | +3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPES.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.71 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.16 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.23 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPES.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPES.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPES.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -28.03% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -16.76% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -28.03% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -28.03% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.14% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 6.51% | -4.75% |
Volatility
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) is 2.04%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SPES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPES.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 7.01% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 14.45% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 19.60% | -9.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 21.94% | -7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 21.31% | -6.60% |
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPES.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPES.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPES.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.
SPES.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPES.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SPES.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer