SPES.L vs. IGDA.L
SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPES.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPES.L returned 12.30%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for IGDA.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPES.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IGDA.L.
Performance
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPES.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPES.L achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 16.46% return.
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IGDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 37.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.18% | 3.95% | 13.66% | 8.18% | 5.88% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.03% | 10.28% | 20.00% | 23.23% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPES.L and IGDA.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SPES.L and IGDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Financial Services
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Industrials
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Healthcare
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Defensive
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Real Estate
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Utilities
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Energy
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Basic Materials
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Communication Services
SPES.L
IGDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPES.L
IGDA.L
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPES.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 5.23 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 18.72 | -7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPES.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.76 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.92 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPES.L drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum IGDA.L drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPES.L and IGDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPES.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -22.43% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -7.20% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -22.43% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -3.93% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 2.02% | -0.26% |
Volatility
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) is 2.04%, while Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that SPES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPES.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 4.45% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.43% | 10.27% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 13.66% | -3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 17.32% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 17.32% | -2.61% |
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPES.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPES.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison
SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPES.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPES.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPES.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
SPES.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPES.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.
Find the right allocation for SPES.L and IGDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer